Skip to main content

Greater sage-grouse population change (percent change) in a high oil and gas development, low population estimate scenario, and with no effects of climate change (2006-2062)

Dates

Publication Date
Start Date
2006
End Date
2062

Citation

Heinrichs, J.A., Aldridge, C., O'Donnell, M., Garman, S.L., and Homer, C., 2019, Influences of Potential Oil and Gas Development and Future Climate on Sage-Grouse Declines and Redistribution: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9GRF34E.

Summary

This data set defines boundaries of oil and gas project areas, greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) core areas, and non-core and non-project areas within the Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative (WLCI; southwestern Wyoming). Specifically, the data represents results from the manuscript “Combined influences of future oil and gas development and climate on potential Sage-grouse declines and redistribution” for high oil and gas development, low population size, and no climate component. The oil and gas development scenario were based on an energy footprint model that simulates well, pad, and road patterns for oil and gas recovery options that vary in well types (vertical and directional) and number of wells per pad and [...]

Contacts

Attached Files

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

Shapefile: GRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.zip
GRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.cpg 5 Bytes
GRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.dbf 67.64 KB
GRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.prj 432 Bytes
GRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.sbn 1.47 KB
GRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.sbx 268 Bytes
GRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.shp 1.84 MB
GRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.shx 1.07 KB

Purpose

The simulated changes in sage-grouse populations presented here can be used to inform management by: 1) understanding the possible range of effects of oil and gas development and future climate influences on sage-grouse habitat, 2) mapping scenarios of how sagebrush vegetation and sage-grouse habitat could change under alternative scenarios, and 3) indicating the degree to which different areas of the landscape could change. These data do not represent absolute predictions, rather they should be interpreted as possible relative differences.

Additional Information

Shapefile Extension

boundingBox
minY40.53593165549031
minX-111.55604248608952
maxY43.81583511969398
maxX-105.8741531228465
files
nameGRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.cpg
contentTypetext/plain
pathOnDisk__disk__2a/d4/5f/2ad45f44a325c1e4f09f8c1fa34837f1237b797f
size5
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:11:02 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.dbf
contentTypetext/plain
pathOnDisk__disk__62/2b/44/622b44fdec053550abc8c76c387b3f0a7b2ca138
size69262
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:11:02 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.prj
contentTypetext/plain
pathOnDisk__disk__f7/cf/5d/f7cf5d036c15db5dbc4cd8da6d8378f351acc080
size432
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:11:02 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.sbn
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__23/b8/97/23b897d6e359e48ac89293b86fcb96a6eeb4e926
size1508
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:11:02 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.sbx
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__2d/f0/0b/2df00b3aa5e8721d92a81d6b56c397e53c53fcd3
size268
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:11:02 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.shp
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__4f/5d/d0/4f5dd08fa3305d01b25f0e1fe351da5ac46829bb
size1930312
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:11:03 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.shx
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__c6/98/8c/c6988cf5d551c855fe60118f01566d78be1e5482
size1092
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:11:02 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop.shp.xml
contentTypeapplication/fgdc+xml
pathOnDisk__disk__bc/6b/84/bc6b845b13b2b55466f66941e0df1742a70dbcc1
dateUploadedThu Aug 20 07:29:30 MDT 2020
originalMetadatatrue
geometryTypeMultiPolygon
nameGRSGoccupancy_HighOG_LowPop

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...