Skip to main content

Data release for Integrating physical and economic data into experimental water accounts for the United States: lessons and opportunities

Dates

Publication Date
Time Period
2020

Citation

Bagstad, K.J., Ancona, Z.H., Hass, J.L., Glynn, P.D., Wentland, S., Vardon, M., and Fay, J., 2020, Data release for Integrating physical and economic data into experimental water accounts for the United States: lessons and opportunities: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9TUTMAT.

Summary

Water provides society with economic benefits that increasingly involve tradeoffs, making accounting for water quality, quantity, and their corresponding economic productivity more relevant in our interconnected world. In the past, physical and economic data about water have been fragmented, but integration is becoming more widely adopted internationally through application of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounts for Water (SEEA-Water), which enables the tracking of linkages between water and the economy over time and across scales. In this paper, we present the first national and subnational SEEA-Water accounts for the United States. We compile accounts for: (1) physical supply and use of water, (2) water productivity, (3) [...]

Contacts

Attached Files

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

Emission Accounts.zip 1.1 KB application/zip
Hydro_Comparison.zip 412 Bytes application/zip
Regional_Emission_Productivity_Use_Quality_CSVs.zip 28.1 KB application/zip
State_Supply_Use_Productivity_Quality.zip 1.42 MB application/zip
Torcellini_Grubert_Hydro_Comparison.zip 412 Bytes application/zip
Water_Accounts20_DataRelease_DataDictionary.csv 15.96 KB text/csv
National_Summary_Tables.zip 28.1 KB application/zip

Purpose

We developed PSUTs and water productivity, quality, and emissions accounts (U.N. 2012). We summarized these accounts at the national level, and for PSUTs and water productivity accounts provide results for all 50 states plus Washington, DC. Water-quality accounts data were available for only the 48 coterminous states. Additionally, we summarize results for PSUTs, water productivity, and water-quality accounts for six regions roughly following the USEPA (2012) definitions: Northeast (Maine south to Maryland and West Virginia), Midwest (Ohio west to Missouri, Iowa, and Minnesota), Southeast (Virginia, Kentucky, Arkansas, and Louisiana, plus all states to their southeast), Plains (Montana, Wyoming, and the Dakotas south to Texas), Northwest (Washington, Oregon, and Idaho), and Southwest (New Mexico and Colorado west to California; see Supplemental Information). We included state-level accounting tables as Supplemental Information. Additionally, we conducted an expert elicitation to conceptually model the linkages between water quality and water use. In the discussion, we describe potential data sources and data gaps for water asset accounts, which prevented us from compiling these accounts but suggest a path forward for their completion in the future.

Additional Information

Identifiers

Type Scheme Key
DOI https://www.sciencebase.gov/vocab/category/item/identifier doi:10.5066/P9TUTMAT

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...