Skip to main content

Ecological Mapping Systems of Kansas and Nebraska

Final Report

Dates

Report date
2021-06-01 05:00:00
Start Date
2016-10-01 05:00:00
End Date
2021-06-01 05:00:00

Citation

David D. Diamond(Author), Lee F. Elliot(Author), Gerry Steinauer(Author), Kelly Kindscher(Author), Phillip A. Hanberry(Author), Diane True(Author), Michael Sunde(Author), 2021-06-01(Reported), Ecological Mapping Systems of Kansas and Nebraska - Final Report

Summary

Leaders within the Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism and the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission recognized the need for current vegetation datasets and maps to facilitate conservation planning and management. Prior to the initiation of this project, Ecological Mapping System (EMS) datasets had been completed by the Missouri Resource Assessment Partnership (MoRAP) for Texas and Oklahoma. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service facilitated meetings among states that highlighted the Texas and Oklahoma datasets. This led state leaders in Kansas and Nebraska to initiate the current project, with the aims of (1) producing the highest quality digital and map datasets possible, and (2) leveraging funds from each state by combining [...]

Contacts

Attached Files

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

md_metadata.json 74.63 KB application/json
metadata_iso1.xml 267.03 KB application/vnd.iso.19139-1+xml
KS and NE Ecological Mapping Systems Final Report.pdf
“Final Report”
955.38 KB application/pdf
Figures.pdf
“Figures”
341.49 KB application/pdf
KS_Range_Maps.pdf
“Kansas Range Maps”
1.39 MB application/pdf
NE_Range_Maps.pdf
“Nebraska Range Maps”
1.26 MB application/pdf
Appendix_Files.xlsx
“Appendices”
67.29 KB application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Tables.xlsx
“Tables”
54.86 KB application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet

Purpose

The goal of the EMS project for Kansas and Nebraska was to address the primary shortcoming in other mapping efforts in order to provide better datasets and maps. Therefore, we included: 1. Use of 10 m resolution Sentinel 2 satellite imagery to provide better spatial resolution, 2. Use of image objects to further improve spatial accuracy by serving as a filter for 10 m pixel data, and to facilitate modeling of mapped types via flexible incorporation of geophysical setting information together with land cover information, 3. Collection of georeferenced ground data by qualified vegetation ecologists that was specifically designed to enhance mapping and development of the datasets, and 4. Close cooperation between state-based vegetation ecologists and geospatial analysts during the entire mapping process to ensure that datasets reflect the best current knowledge of vegetation in Kansas and Nebraska.

Map

Spatial Services

ScienceBase WMS

Communities

  • Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative
  • LC MAP - Landscape Conservation Management and Analysis Portal

Associated Items

Tags

Provenance

generated using ADIwg mdTranslator 2.17.1

Additional Information

Identifiers

Type Scheme Key
info:doi/ info:doi/ https://doi.org/10.7944/P9VLM7ZF

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...