Rockland County Water-Resource Assessment

Dates

End Date: 2010

Summary

INTRODUCTION • Concerns over the viability of the fractured bedrock aquifer that provides about 1/3 of Rockland County’s water supply prompted a 5-year study by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to (1) define the hydrogeologic framework of the aquifer, (2) assess conditions within it, and (3) identify other potential sources of water for the County. The study was done in cooperation with Rockland County and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. • Population growth in Rockland County to nearly 300,000 people has been paralleled by significant hydrologic changes over the past 50 years –water demand and impervious surface area have increased, and sanitary sewers now serve most areas and discharge wastewater to [...]

Summary

INTRODUCTION

• Concerns over the viability of the fractured bedrock aquifer that provides about 1/3 of Rockland County’s water supply prompted a 5-year study by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to (1) define the hydrogeologic framework of the aquifer, (2) assess conditions within it, and (3) identify other potential sources of water for the County. The study was done in cooperation with Rockland County and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

• Population growth in Rockland County to nearly 300,000 people has been paralleled by significant hydrologic changes over the past 50 years –water demand and impervious surface area have increased, and sanitary sewers now serve most areas and discharge wastewater to the Hudson and Ramapo Rivers. Total water use in 2005 was estimated at 12.9 billion gallons. Peak water demand during the Summer exceeds other times of year by as much as 50 percent.

• Public Water Supply in 2005 was provided by three sources in nearly equal parts:

(1) The fractured sedimentary bedrock aquifer that underlies most of the developed areas of the County

(2) Alluvial (sand and gravel) aquifers in the Ramapo and Mahwah River valleys

(3) Surface-water impoundment of the Hackensack River at Lake DeForest - Water withdrawals at both Lake Deforest and in the Ramapo Valley wellfield are limited by requirements for streamflow maintenance downstream into New Jersey.

•

Water Use in Rockland County was about 12.9 billion gallons in 2005, with residential use the largest category. The increase in summertime use is the next largest category (much of it lawn watering and other outside uses that do not go to the sanitary sewer system). Average domestic water use from private wells was estimated at about 1.4 million gallons per day (4 percent of total water use).

HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK

• The sedimentary bedrock aquifer underlies the lowland part of the county and consists, from east to west, of mudstone, sandstone, and conglomerate strata that have been tilted about 10 degrees toward the northwest. Fractures parallel to the bedding planes of the sedimentary bedrock are the major water-bearing zones in the aquifer.

• The tilt or dip of the water-bearing fractures with the bedding produces regional groundwater flow “with the grain” (along the strike) of the bedrock, either to the northeast or the southwest. Groundwater flow “against the grain” is localized and generally shallow. Therefore, pumping wells affect groundwater levels in bedrock aquifer areas to the northeast and southwest of each well, and updip to the southeast. Pumping from major wellfields has caused groundwater levels to decline as far as 1 mile away.

• The Regional groundwater flow system was defined by overlaying the aquifer framework over a groundwater-level map and then identifying groundwater divides. Groundwater flows from divide areas toward lower elevation discharge areas –rivers, streams, lakes, and wetlands. The dominant regional flow directions are to the northeast and southwest, and the major groundwater divide parallels the Palisades Parkway.

BEDROCK AQUIFER CONDITIONS

• There has not been a continuous downward trend in groundwater levels across the bedrock aquifer, based on review of pumpage and water-level data as far back as 1989. Groundwater levels have locally declined in response to new stresses from production wells, especially when they have been used continuously.

• The greatest concern regarding sustainability of groundwater resources is the aquifer response to the annual increase in pumpage from May through October (a 25-percent average increase in 2005). Summertime groundwater-level decline rates at public supply wells were used to extrapolate groundwater declines under constant pumping at each well from initial May water levels through October. Results indicate that water levels at one-third of supply wells would approach the depth of the well pump before October. As a result, pumping rates would have to be reduced at these wells to prevent further water-level declines. Large water-level declines could also increase the likelihood of air entrainment in pumping wells, which is another constraint on pumping rate.

• Streams are also affected by seasonal groundwater pumping. Nearly all but the largest streams in the productive west-central area of the aquifer ceased to flow during dry conditions in late summer of 2005. Seasonal groundwater-level fluctuations in the aquifer were also largest within that same area.

• Annual recharge estimates from historic streamflow data range from 15 to 25 inches across the county; this variation arises from differences in precipitation, overburden thickness, and percent of impervious cover.

Comparisons of groundwater withdrawals in 2006 with recharge estimates derived from three gaged stream basins indicate that pumpage is equivalent to between 12 and 24 percent of recharge in these watersheds.

• Impervious surfaces (1) prevent recharge of the aquifer, (2) prevent uptake of moisture by vegetation, and (3) rapidly route stormwater runoff to streams, which increases peak stormflows. A 17 percent impervious surface area in the Pascack Brook watershed results in about a 5 percent loss of recharge per year (nearly 400 million gallons of water).

• Sanitary Sewering transported about 14.7 billion gallons of water from Rockland County to the Hudson and Ramapo Rivers in 2005. This amount exceeds the water use estimate for that year. The pattern of flows to the treatment plants is different (more like streamflow) than the seasonal water-use pattern. The reason for this discrepancy is that during and after storms, sanitary sewers receive inflow of storm runoff , groundwater infiltration, and perhaps sump pump discharges from homes.

POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL WATER SOURCES –From a purely hydrologic perspective (each of these sources have their own set of caveats and concerns other than hydrology)

1. Increased Pumpage from the Bedrock Aquifer is possible in areas of the aquifer that are not currently tapped for public supply. Individual well yields would likely be lower than those of most current supply wells.

2. Ambrey Pond Reservoir has been proposed in the northern part of the County. It would draw surface water from Highlands area drainages, including Lake Tiorati.

3. Stormwater retention / reuse. Retention, treatment, and transfer of stormwater from key drainages in the County is a potential means of retaining water lost to impervious surfaces.

4. Increase Flow Augmentation to the Ramapo River through releases from the Stony Brook watershed. This would help maintain pumping capacity of the Ramapo Valley Wellfield. Storage of excess streamflowin an impoundment could be released to the Ramapo River during dry periods.

5. Desalination of Water from the Hudson River. The Hudson River represents a continuous source of brackish water that could be treated to provide a source of freshwater.

6. Indirect Use of Recycled Water –14.7 billion gallons of treated wastewater was available to Rockland County in 2005 –more than the total water use that year. Diversion of at least part of that water, highly treated with further natural treatment in wetlands or surface waters prior to joining drinking water supplies, offers a continuous source of freshwater for local and regional water needs.

Summary of Results from the USGS Water-Resource Investigation of Rockland County, New York, 2005-2007

In 2004, concerns over the sustainability of water resources in Rockland County, New York prompted an assessment of the hydrogeology of Rockland County by the U.S. Geological Survey. The investigation included a review of all resources, but focused on the Newark Basin aquifer, a fractured, sedimentary bedrock aquifer over which nearly 300,000 people reside. About 12.7 billion gallons of water were used in Rockland County in 2005, about 35 percent of which was withdrawn from the bedrock aquifer. A regional conceptual model of the aquifer framework was developed and integrated with other hydrogeologic data to define the regional groundwater flow system. Groundwater flow within the aquifer is largely constrained by the strike of the dipping conglomerate, sandstone, and siltstone bedrock units, as the most productive water-bearing fractures are subparallel to the bedding of these units.

Review of pumpage and water-level data from the bedrock aquifer back to 1989 suggests that there has not been a continuous downward trend in groundwater levels across the aquifer. Groundwater levels have locally declined in response to new stresses from production wells, especially when they have been used continuously. The greatest concern regarding sustainability of groundwater resources is the aquifer response to the annual increase in pumpage from May through October (a 25 percent average increase in 2005). Streams are also affected by seasonal groundwater pumpage; nearly all streams in the productive west-central area of the aquifer ceased to flow during the dry late summer of 2005. Annual recharge estimates from 1961 streamflow data range from 15 to 25 inches; this variation arises from differences in precipitation, overburden thickness, and percent of impervious cover across the aquifer. Sustainability of water resources in Rockland County is largely dependent on: (1) the ability to adjust water-use during drought periods and during summer peak-demand periods, and (2) to avoid loss of supply from groundwater contamination.

Rockland County Water-Resource Assessment webpage

Publications

Heisig, P.M., 2010, Water resources of Rockland County, New York, 2005–07, with emphasis on the Newark basin bedrock aquifer: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5245, 130 p., at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5245/ .

Yager, R.M. and Ratcliffe, N.M., 2010, Hydrogeology and simulation of groundwater flow in fractured rock in the Newark basin, Rockland County, New York: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5250, 137 p., at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5250/ .

Project Location by County

Rockland County, NY

Contacts

Principal Investigator :: Paul M Heisig
Funding Agency :: Rockland County, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, Cooperative Water Program
CMS Group :: New York Water Science Center

Attached Files

sorting

Metadata First

Recent First

Alphabetical

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

LK00-BBI01-Fig1.jpg “Impervious Surface Effects Rockland County NY”	164.48 KB	image/jpeg
LK00-BBI01-Fig2.jpg “Seasonality of Bedrock Aquifer Withdrawals Rockland County NY”	147.01 KB	image/jpeg
LK00-BBI01-Fig3.jpg “2005 Water Use Rockland County NY”	72.35 KB	image/jpeg
LK00-BBI01-Fig4.jpg “Water Sources Rockland County NY”	175.02 KB	image/jpeg
rocklandfactsheet.pdf “Rockland Co. Water Resources Summary of Findings handout”	194.66 KB	application/pdf
April 2010 Rockland talk.pdf “2010 Rockland Co. Water Resources Powerpoint”	4.3 MB	application/pdf
Rocklandrunoff.ogv “storm water runoff video”	4.48 MB	video/ogg
readme.txt “GW model archive for Rockland County, NY”	7 KB	text/plain
sir2010-5250.gwmarciv_zip_index.pdf “Index view of sir2010-5250.”	161.55 KB	application/pdf
YAGER_figure.pdf “Simulated 10-Year Bedrock Production Well Capture Zones ”	1.5 MB	application/pdf
Rocklandpumpge.jpg “Changes in Water Use, Population, and Road Miles in Rockland County, NY”	87.65 KB	image/jpeg
Pinebrook_Q_WL_editbig.jpg “Example of Annual Pumpage and Groundwater-Level response at a supply well”	47.18 KB	image/jpeg
Flowdippingbeds.jpg “Conceptualization of Regional Groundwater Flow in Dipping Sedimentary Bedrock ”	68.09 KB	image/jpeg
dipangle.jpg “How the Dip Angle of Sedimentary Bedrock (and Water-bearing Fractures) Affects t”	35.43 KB	image/jpeg
Chloride.jpg “Changes in Chloride Concentration Over Time at Production Wells, Rockland County”	60.38 KB	image/jpeg
peakflow.jpg “Peak Flow Responses in Streams Whose Watersheds have Different Percentages of Im”	64.16 KB	image/jpeg
recharge.jpg “Estimates of Recharge across Rockland County, NY from a Temporary Streamflow Gag”	121.58 KB	image/jpeg
WWTP2big.jpg “Cumulative Treated Wastewater Discharge to the Hudson River, Compared with Preci”	62.65 KB	image/jpeg

Shapefile: Heisig_Rockland_2457_ROK1.zip
Heisig_Rockland_2457_ROK1.shp		1.18 KB
Heisig_Rockland_2457_ROK1.dbf		434 Bytes
Heisig_Rockland_2457_ROK1.shx		108 Bytes
Heisig_Rockland_2457_ROK1.prj		424 Bytes

Related External Resources

Type: Web Link

Hydrogeology and simulation of groundwater flow in fractured rock in the Newark basin, Rockland County, New York	http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5245/
Hydrogeology and simulation of groundwater flow in fractured rock in the Newark basin, Rockland County, New York	http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5250/
Rockland County	http://www.co.rockland.ny.us/
Rockland County Department of Health -- Peak Water Supply available for new development	http://www.co.rockland.ny.us/health/EI/ws.htm
New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Groundwater	http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/36064.html
New Jersey DEP	http://www.state.nj.us/dep/infofinder/topics/water.htm
United Water New York	http://www.unitedwater.com/newyork/index.aspx
USEPA	http://www.epa.gov/safewater/protect.html
LaMont-Doherty Earth Observatory -- Water Resources in Rockland County	http://superfund.ciesin.columbia.edu/Rocklandwater/

Project Extension

parts

type	Short Project Description
value	Concerns over the viability of the fractured bedrock aquifer that provides about 1/3 of Rockland County’s water supply prompted a 5-year study by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to (1) define the hydrogeologic framework of the aquifer, (2) assess conditions within it, and (3) identify other potential sources of water for the County.

projectProducts

productDescription	Heisig, P.M., 2010, Water resources of Rockland County, New York, 2005–07, with emphasis on the Newark basin bedrock aquifer: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5245, 130 p., at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5245/ .
status	Delivered

productDescription	Yager, R.M. and Ratcliffe, N.M., 2010, Hydrogeology and simulation of groundwater flow in fractured rock in the Newark basin, Rockland County, New York: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5250, 137 p., at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5250/ .
status	Delivered

projectStatus

Completed

Rockland County Water-Resource Assessment

Dates

Summary

Summary

Contacts

Attached Files

sorting

Metadata First

Recent First

Alphabetical

Project Extension

Preview Image

Map

Spatial Services

Communities

Tags

Provenance

Additional Information

Alternate Titles

Identifiers

Shapefile Extension

Item Actions

Use Item

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...

Dates

Summary

Summary

Contacts

Attached Files sorting Metadata First Recent First Alphabetical

Related External Resources

Project Extension

Preview Image

Map

Spatial Services

Communities

Tags

Provenance

Additional Information

Alternate Titles

Identifiers

Shapefile Extension

Item Actions

Use Item

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...

Attached Files

sorting

Metadata First

Recent First

Alphabetical