Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: 2015 (X) > partyWithName: Dana M. Infante (X) > Types: OGC WMS Layer (X)

42 results (52ms)   

Filters
Date Range
Extensions
Types
Contacts
Categories
Tag Types
Tag Schemes
View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
The habitats of the Southeast Atlantic states range from the mountains and uplands in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont areas in the western portion of this region to the Southeastern and Coastal Plains. Fish habitats in the higher elevation regions are typically fast-moving, clear, coldwater streams originating from seeps and springs, while warmwater rivers of the plains carry more organic material and sediment. This diversity of habitats along a very long period of stable geologic activity produces one of the most diverse assemblages of aquatic species in the nation. The Altamaha, Chattahoochee, Flint, Savannah, Catawba, Pee Dee, Broad, and Neuse are major rivers of the region. There are a large number of dams on waterways...
thumbnail
State-wide data on fish populations were limited in Alaska for use in this assessment, as was a detailed spatial (mapping) framework that fully characterizes watersheds throughout the state at the time this assessment was conducted. Because of these factors, we modified our assessment methods to account for these limitations. Twenty-one landscape disturbance variables were assembled from medium-sized watersheds throughout the state (i.e., 12-digit hydrologic unit code watersheds). Variables were then assigned to one of six categories based on their disturbances to stream habitats. Categories include: urban land use, agricultural land use, point source pollution and water quality, barriers to fish movement, human...
thumbnail
In the mostly arid Southwestern United States, water availability (hydrology – a key fish habitat process), wildfires, and grazing intensity are important disturbances that are known to have major, negative effects on fish habitats. While this assessment indicated that many of the streams in this region are in good condition, a number of key habitat variables (i.e. water availability, wildlife frequency and intensity, and grazing intensity) could not be directly included in this assessment because national datasets of these disturbances and their measured variable are unavailable. Their absence from this assessment, along with absences of other disturbances, has likely produced an overestimation of habitat condition...
thumbnail
A. Pervasive disturbances: The most common disturbances based on total stream length in a given region. Top five overall most pervasive disturbances to all stream reaches, regardless of stream size and across all spatial scales (ranked highest first): Total excessive (anthropogenic or man caused) sediment yield Impervious surface cover Road crossing density Population density Pasture and hay land use Top three most pervasive disturbances to creeks (<100 km 2 watersheds) across all spatial scales : Total excessive sediment yield Impervious (hard) surface cover Road crossing density Top three most pervasive disturbances to rivers (>100 km 2 watersheds) across all spatial scales: Upstream dam density...
thumbnail
Map of the risk of current fish habitat degradation of inland streams of the Mid-Atlantic States region.
thumbnail
A. Pervasive disturbances: The most common disturbances based on total stream length in a given region. Top five overall most pervasive disturbances to all stream reaches, regardless of stream size and across all spatial scales (ranked highest first): Crop land use Low intensity urban land use Impervious surface cover Road crossing density Agricultural water withdrawal Top five most pervasive disturbances to , specific to spatial scale: Crop land use in network catchments Crop land use in network buffers Low intensity urban land use in network catchments Crop land use in local buffers Impervious surface cover in network catchments In the Northern Plains state group, 36.6% of streams are classified as low...
thumbnail
Map of the risk of current fish habitat degradation of inland streams of the Central Midwest States.
thumbnail
Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota border four of the five Great Lakes (lakes Michigan, Superior, Huron, and Erie) and have over 150,000 miles of rivers and streams and 50,000 inland lakes within their boundaries. The upper Mississippi River flows through the Upper Midwest states, from its headwaters in Minnesota along the boundary between Minnesota and Wisconsin. Much of the region has deep glacial deposits which has a tremendous influence over the habitat types and water flow (hydrology), providing for some of the most stable river flows in the United States. An exception to the glaciated region is a unique region of deeply carved unglaciated river valleys known as “The Driftless Area” which located in southwestern...
thumbnail
A. Pervasive disturbances: The most common disturbances based on total stream length in a given region. Top five overall most pervasive disturbances to all stream reaches, regardless of stream size and across all spatial scales (ranked highest first): Crop land use Low intensity urban land use Pasture and hay land use Impervious surface cover Population density Top three most pervasive disturbances to creeks (watersheds <100 km 2 in area) across all spatial scales: Crop land use Low intensity urban land use Pasture and hay land use Top three most pervasive disturbances to rivers (watersheds >100 km 2 in area) across all spatial scales : Crop land use Impervious surface cover Pasture and hay land use Top...
thumbnail
While fish habitat was found to be generally to be at very low or low risk of degradation in this mostly arid western region of the United States, water availability (hydrology – a key fish habitat process and driver of fish habitat) could only be partly examined using the available datasets in this Assessment. The lack of information on the status of water flow in many basins has led them being overestimated in fish habitat quality, even if streams in these basins are actually dry most of year. Additionally, data availability for grazing intensity, another key landscape use, is also unavailable, and has also created situations where the Assessment overestimates habitat quality. Despite such absences, impairment...
thumbnail
While this assessment has found that many of the inland streams were at a low or very low risk of degradation, some fish habitat disturbances, including water diversions, timber harvest practices, and intensity of livestock grazing in watersheds, could not be directly included in this assessment because national datasets of these disturbances and their component variables are unavailable. These disturbances are known to have major, negative effects on fish habitats in this region. Their absence from this assessment, along with absences of other disturbances, has likely produced an overestimation of habitat condition (quality) for some water bodies. These gaps need to be kept in mind while examining the results....
thumbnail
The Central Mississippi River states contain the confluences of the Upper Mississippi River with the Ohio, Missouri, and Arkansas rivers. Alteration of these large rivers for transportation and flood control has substantially altered their ecological characteristics, eliminating natural floodplains, sandbars, and meanders, and impeding fish migration routes. Other major tributary rivers include the Tennessee, Cumberland, Kentucky, and Osage, all very large rivers in their own right. Large reservoirs are common in the landscape of this region and have increased recreational opportunities for sportfish as well as many other activities, but typically suffer from dissolved oxygen issues in both the reservoirs and in...
thumbnail
Map of the risk of current fish habitat degradation of inland streams of the Southwestern States.
thumbnail
Map of the risk of current fish habitat degradation of inland streams of the Upper Midwest States.
thumbnail
Map of the risk of current fish habitat degradation of inland streams of the Pacific Coast States.
thumbnail
While this assessment has found that much of the stream habitat in this region is at low or very low risk of degradation, some key fish habitat disturbances, including water withdrawals or diversions and intensity of livestock grazing in watersheds, could not be directly included in this assessment because national datasets of these disturbances and their supporting variables are unavailable. These disturbances are known to have major, negative effects on fish habitats in this region. Their absence from this assessment, along with absences of other disturbances, has likely produced an overestimation of habitat condition (quality) for some water bodies. Despite such absences, impairment to fish habitats was determined...
thumbnail
A. Pervasive disturbances: The most common disturbances based on total stream length in a given region. Top five overall most pervasive disturbances to all stream reaches, regardless of stream size and across all spatial scales (ranked highest first): Impervious surface cover Population density Low intensity urban land use Road length density Downstream dam density Top three most pervasive disturbances to creeks (watersheds <100 km 2 in area) across all spatial scales: Impervious surface cover Low intensity urban land use Population density Top three most pervasive disturbances to rivers (watersheds >100 km 2 in area) across all spatial scales: Upstream dam density Pasture and hay land use Population...


map background search result map search result map Central Midwest States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Mid-Atlantic States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Upper Midwest States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Summary of Scientific Findings for Southwestern States Southwestern States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Summary of scientific findings for Pacific Coast States Summary of Scientific Findings for Central Mississippi River States Most Pervasive and Severe Disturbances for the Northern Plains States Summary of Scientific Findings for Upper Midwest States Central Mississippi River States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Pacific Coast States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Most Pervasive and Severe Disturbances for the Central Midwest States Hawaii - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Generalized Methodology for Stream Assessments of Alaska and Hawaii Most Pervasive and Severe Disturbances for the Eastern Gulf of Mexico States Summary of Scientific Findings for Mountain States Summary of Scientific Findings for Southeast Atlantic States Southeast Atlantic States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Most Pervasive and Severe Disturbances for the Southeast Atlantic States Summary of Scientific Findings for Southern Plains States Mid-Atlantic States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Summary of Scientific Findings for Southeast Atlantic States Southeast Atlantic States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Most Pervasive and Severe Disturbances for the Southeast Atlantic States Most Pervasive and Severe Disturbances for the Northern Plains States Central Midwest States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Summary of Scientific Findings for Central Mississippi River States Central Mississippi River States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Upper Midwest States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Summary of Scientific Findings for Upper Midwest States Most Pervasive and Severe Disturbances for the Eastern Gulf of Mexico States Summary of scientific findings for Pacific Coast States Pacific Coast States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Summary of Scientific Findings for Southwestern States Southwestern States - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Summary of Scientific Findings for Mountain States Summary of Scientific Findings for Southern Plains States Hawaii - Risk of Current Fish Habitat Degradation Map Generalized Methodology for Stream Assessments of Alaska and Hawaii