Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: Remediation (X) > Types: Downloadable (X)

9 results (112ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
This assessment raster is used to answer management questions (MQs) about where the Sage Grouse conservation element (CE) overlap with change agents (CAs). This is a basic footprint assessment of anthropogenic features (urban development, roads, etc) and invasive annual grasses intersecting with Sage Grouse habitat. It does not model actual response of the CEs to the CAs; those more complex issues are addressed in different MQs and through different models. Areas for restoration/enhancement were indentified base upon the 3 quartile values (50>LC2025<=75, .5>AG<=.75). Areas of the CE distribution that are not overlapped by the 2025 development scenario (which includes current and 2025 devt), and that are not overlapped...
thumbnail
This raster is used to answer the management question (MQ) regarding areas of low potential for renewable energy development (solar, wind, geothermal) that could potentially mitigate impacts to CEs from potential energy development in the Central Basin and Range Ecoregion. The value indicated in the raster represents a score between 0-100, the lower values indicating areas of poor landscape condition (ecological integrity). The higher the score, better landscape conditions are expected. Areas in the middle of the spectrum likely offer areas that present opportunities for mitigation under the logic that these areas are likely to be mildly impacted by change agents and therefore present opportunities for mitigation/restoration....
thumbnail
This raster is used to answer the management question (MQ) regarding areas of low potential for renewable energy development (solar, wind, geothermal) that could potentially mitigate impacts to CEs from potential energy development in the Mojave Basin and Range Ecoregion. The value indicated in the raster represents a score between 0-100, the lower values indicating areas of poor landscape condition (ecological integrity). The higher the score, better landscape conditions are expected. Areas in the middle of the spectrum likely offer areas that present opportunities for mitigation under the logic that these areas are likely to be mildly impacted by change agents and therefore present opportunities for mitigation/restoration....
thumbnail
This assessment raster is used to answer management questions (MQs) about where the Desert Tortoise conservation element (CE) overlap with change agents (CAs). This is a basic footprint assessment of anthropogenic features (urban development, roads, etc). It does not model actual response of the CEs to the CAs; those more complex issues are addressed in different MQs and through different models. Areas for restoration/enhancement were indentified base upon the 3 quartile values (50>LC2025
thumbnail
ICIS-NPDES is an information management system maintained by the Office of Compliance to track permit compliance and enforcement status of facilities regulated by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) under the Clean Water Act (CWA). ICIS-NPDES is designed to support the NPDES program at the state, regional, and national levels.Active facilities are those currently in operation. Major/federally-reportable are facilities for which states must submit compliance and enforcement data to EPA. Under the Clean Water Act, a major facility is any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction...
thumbnail
Wild insect pollination has significant positive effects on pollinator-dependent crop production. While managed honeybees are often used to provide pollination to pollinator-dependent crops, visits by wild insect pollinators have been shown to be more effective in increasing fruit set than managed pollinators, and wild insect pollination increases fruit set even when managed pollinator visitation is high (Garibaldi et al. 2013). The total value of the pollination services provided by wild, native insects has been estimated at $3.07 billion annually (2003 dollars) in the United States (Losey & Vaughan 2006). To assess the spatial distribution of potential wild insect pollination, we mapped the supply of potential...
thumbnail
This layer represents areas that have been designated by the states of California and Nevada as priority zones for development for renewable energy in the Central Great Basin and Range Ecoregion. These layers were assembled from two sources: Nevada Renewable Energy and Proposed Interconnections Map. Gov. Jim Gibbons Nevada Renewable Energy and Transmission Access Advisory Committee (RETAAC), Phase II Report. June 26, 2009. California Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (RETI). Phase 2B Maps (CREZ and Transmission Line Sebments Revised to Reflect Phase 2B). April 8, 2010. Utah does not have priority zones for renewable energy development.
thumbnail
This raster is used to answer the management question (MQ) regarding areas of low potential for renewable energy development (solar, wind, geothermal) that could potentially mitigate impacts to CEs from potential energy development in the Mojave Basin and Range Ecoregion. The value indicated in the raster represents a score between 0-100, the lower values indicating areas of poor landscape condition (ecological integrity). The higher the score, better landscape conditions are expected. Areas in the middle of the spectrum likely offer areas that present opportunities for mitigation under the logic that these areas are likely to be mildly impacted by change agents and therefore present opportunities for mitigation/restoration....
thumbnail
This assessment raster is used to answer management questions (MQs) about where the Bighorn Sheep conservation element (CE) overlap with change agents (CAs). This is a basic footprint assessment of anthropogenic features (urban development, roads, etc). It does not model actual response of the CEs to the CAs; those more complex issues are addressed in different MQs and through different models. Areas for restoration/enhancement were indentified base upon the 3 quartile values (50>LC2025


    map background search result map search result map Conservation and Restoration Priorities for Wild Pollinator Habitat in the Southeast United States, by Subwatershed (2011) BLM REA MBR 2010 2010.ILMREADBO.MBR MQ7 180711 BHSH CA HabitatRestorationEnhancement poly BLM REA MBR 2010 Areas with Low Renewable Energy Potential and Opportunities for Mitigation Fig 7 BLM REA MBR 2010 2010.ILMREADBO.MBR MQ7 173856 DETO CA HabitatRestorationEnhancement poly BLM REA MBR 2010 Areas with Low Renewable Energy Potential and Opportunities for Mitigation Fig 14 BLM REA COP 2014 UT COP NPDES Pts ICIS Facilities BLM REA CBR 2010 Greater Sage Grouse - Opportunities for habitat restoration/enhancement BLM REA CBR 2010 Areas with Low Renewable Energy Potential and Opportunities for Mitigation BLM REA CBR 2010 Priority Renewable Energy Zones BLM REA MBR 2010 2010.ILMREADBO.MBR MQ7 173856 DETO CA HabitatRestorationEnhancement poly BLM REA MBR 2010 2010.ILMREADBO.MBR MQ7 180711 BHSH CA HabitatRestorationEnhancement poly BLM REA CBR 2010 Priority Renewable Energy Zones BLM REA CBR 2010 Greater Sage Grouse - Opportunities for habitat restoration/enhancement BLM REA COP 2014 UT COP NPDES Pts ICIS Facilities BLM REA MBR 2010 Areas with Low Renewable Energy Potential and Opportunities for Mitigation Fig 7 BLM REA MBR 2010 Areas with Low Renewable Energy Potential and Opportunities for Mitigation Fig 14 BLM REA CBR 2010 Areas with Low Renewable Energy Potential and Opportunities for Mitigation Conservation and Restoration Priorities for Wild Pollinator Habitat in the Southeast United States, by Subwatershed (2011)