Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: Wildfire (X) > Types: Downloadable (X)

191 results (14ms)   

Filters
Date Range
Extensions
Types
Contacts
Categories
Tag Types
Tag Schemes
View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
Fire type predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area with five classes: 1) shrub vegetation with torching flames; 2) shrub vegetation without torching flames; 3) forest with torching flames; 4) forest without torching flames; 5) grass or non-vegetation. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model...
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 6 (FIL6) with flame lengths in the range of 3.7-15 m predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5...
thumbnail
Shapefile of a set of fires sampled from the GNLCC Large Fire Database, 1984-2011. This sampled was collected from across the total variability in climate within the Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative (GNLCC) study area. Additional detail about the topography, climate, and burn severity was collected for this identified sample, and used to model fire refugia and low-severity burn probability within the fire perimeters.Each fire has a unique numeric identifier of “PolyID”. Additional attributes are as follows:FIRE_ID: For those fires with an ID, the ID assigned by the reporting agency of the MTBS project.FIRENAME: Names of those fires which are named. This is uncommon in Canada.YEAR: The year the fire...
thumbnail
Idaho communities at risk from wildfire, as listed in the Federal Register (August 17,2001). Assist land managers in prioritizing areas that would benefit from hazardous fuels reduction and community assistance programs. Listing is intended to focus management on priority areas, but does not determine whether a particular community receives funding. This dataset was used in the "Idaho Interagency Assessment of Wildland Fire Risk to Communities, 2006" to derive Communities At Risk From Wildland Fire of Idaho - Map 6B. It has also been used in other BLM planning efforts such as Resource Management Plans, Fire Management Plans, and NEPA analysis.
thumbnail
Current fire occurrence was modeled from a logic model to characterize the potential occurrence of wildfire.The attribute Fire_C_Fz is symbolized to represent the current potential occurrence of wildfire in one of five categories ranging from very low to very high. Historic fire occurrence data were obtained from a number of sources including GEOMAC, BLM, and USGS.
thumbnail
This dataset is a raster of predicted suitable bioclimate using statistical correlations between known habitat and current climate (1950-1999 average) , and then projecting that niche into the future. The future timeslices used are 2020's, which is an average of 2020-2029, and 2050's which is 2050-2059. The Values 1-6 show the degree of model agreement (For example: areas with a value of 1 is where only 1 GCM predicted suitability; pixels with a value of 6 are where 6 GCMs predicted suitability, ect). *see Maxent output pdfs for more details about model inputs and settings.
thumbnail
This dataset is a raster of predicted suitable bioclimate using statistical correlations between known habitat and current climate (1950-1999 average) , and then projecting that niche into the future. The future timeslices used are 2020's, which is an average of 2020-2029, and 2050's which is 2050-2059. The Values 1-6 show the degree of model agreement (For example: areas with a value of 1 is where only 1 GCM predicted suitability; pixels with a value of 6 are where 6 GCMs predicted suitability, ect). *see Maxent output pdfs for more details about model inputs and settings.
thumbnail
This dataset is a raster of predicted suitable bioclimate using statistical correlations between known habitat and current climate (1950-1999 average) , and then projecting that niche into the future. The future timeslices used are 2020's, which is an average of 2020-2029, and 2050's which is 2050-2059. The Values 1-6 show the degree of model agreement (For example: areas with a value of 1 is where only 1 GCM predicted suitability; pixels with a value of 6 are where 6 GCMs predicted suitability, ect). *see Maxent output pdfs for more details about model inputs and settings.
thumbnail
The Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) project assesses the frequency, extent, and magnitude (size and severity) of all large wildland fires (includes wildfire, wildland fire use, and prescribed fire) in the conterminous United States (CONUS), Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico for the period of 1984 through 2010. All fires reported as greater than 1,000 acres in the western U.S. and greater than 500 acres in the eastern U.S. are mapped across all ownerships. MTBS produces a series of geospatial and tabular data for analysis at a range of spatial, temporal, and thematic scales and are intended to meet a variety of information needs that require consistent data about fire effects through space and time. This...
thumbnail
The Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) project assesses the frequency, extent, and magnitude (size and severity) of all large wildland fires (includes wildfire, wildland fire use, and prescribed fire) in the conterminous United States (CONUS), Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico for the period of 1984 through 2010. All fires reported as greater than 1,000 acres in the western U.S. and greater than 500 acres in the eastern U.S. are mapped across all ownerships. MTBS produces a series of geospatial and tabular data for analysis at a range of spatial, temporal, and thematic scales and are intended to meet a variety of information needs that require consistent data about fire effects through space and time. This...
thumbnail
The FSim burn probability was used to determine the burn probability of greater sage-grouse preliminary priority habitat (PPH) in the ecoregion. This layer was used to examine wildfire risk to greater sage-grouse PPH within the ecoregion.
thumbnail
The FSim burn probability was used to determine the burn probability of the pygmy rabbit habitat within the ecoregion. This layer was used to examine wildfire risk pygmy rabbit.
thumbnail
This dataset is a raster of predicted suitable bioclimate using statistical correlations between known habitat and current climate (1950-1999 average) , and then projecting that niche into the future. The future timeslices used are 2020's, which is an average of 2020-2029, and 2050's which is 2050-2059. The Values 1-6 show the degree of model agreement (For example: areas with a value of 1 is where only 1 GCM predicted suitability; pixels with a value of 6 are where 6 GCMs predicted suitability, ect). *see Maxent output pdfs for more details about model inputs and settings.
thumbnail
This dataset is a raster of predicted suitable bioclimate using statistical correlations between known habitat and current climate (1950-1999 average) , and then projecting that niche into the future. The future timeslices used are 2020's, which is an average of 2020-2029, and 2050's which is 2050-2059. The Values 1-6 show the degree of model agreement (For example: areas with a value of 1 is where only 1 GCM predicted suitability; pixels with a value of 6 are where 6 GCMs predicted suitability, ect). *see Maxent output pdfs for more details about model inputs and settings.
thumbnail
This dataset is a raster of predicted suitable bioclimate using statistical correlations between known habitat and current climate (1950-1999 average) , and then projecting that niche into the future. The future timeslices used are 2020's, which is an average of 2020-2029, and 2050's which is 2050-2059. The Values 1-6 show the degree of model agreement (For example: areas with a value of 1 is where only 1 GCM predicted suitability; pixels with a value of 6 are where 6 GCMs predicted suitability, ect). *see Maxent output pdfs for more details about model inputs and settings.
thumbnail
This dataset is a raster of predicted suitable bioclimate using statistical correlations between known habitat and current climate (1950-1999 average) , and then projecting that niche into the future. The future timeslices used are 2020's, which is an average of 2020-2029, and 2050's which is 2050-2059. The Values 1-6 show the degree of model agreement (For example: areas with a value of 1 is where only 1 GCM predicted suitability; pixels with a value of 6 are where 6 GCMs predicted suitability, ect). *see Maxent output pdfs for more details about model inputs and settings.
thumbnail
This dataset is a raster of predicted suitable bioclimate using statistical correlations between known habitat and current climate (1950-1999 average) , and then projecting that niche into the future. The future timeslices used are 2020's, which is an average of 2020-2029, and 2050's which is 2050-2059. The Values 1-6 show the degree of model agreement (For example: areas with a value of 1 is where only 1 GCM predicted suitability; pixels with a value of 6 are where 6 GCMs predicted suitability, ect). *see Maxent output pdfs for more details about model inputs and settings.
Solar radiation grids were produced for a set of large fires sampled from within the Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative study area. This solar radiation grid was produced using the Area Solar Radiation tool in ArcGIS 10.1, using inputs of the associated 30m DEM.
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) raster dataset predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathway.
thumbnail
Fire Intensity raster dataset predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathway.


map background search result map search result map Communities At Risk From Wildland Fire of Idaho GNLCC Refugia Project Sampled Fires Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 6, predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Fire Intensity predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Fire type predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area BLM REA NGB 2011 Fsim Burn Probability in Pygmy Rabbit Habitat BLM REA NGB 2011 Fsim Burn Probability in Greater sage-grouse PPH BLM REA NWP 2011 FI C 2003 MTBS BLM REA NWP 2011 FI C 2006 MTBS BLM REA SLV 2013 C Fire 1km Poly BLM REA MBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Inter-Mountain Basins Big Curly Leaf Mountain Mahogany Woodland and Shrubland BLM REA MBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Columbian Sharp Tailed Grouse BLM REA MBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Bald Eagle BLM REA MBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Brewers Sparrow (Breeding) BLM REA CBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Mule Deer Class F Year Round BLM REA CBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Desert Tortoise Mojave Population BLM REA CBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Mojave Rattlesnake BLM REA CBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Gila Monster BLM REA SLV 2013 C Fire 1km Poly Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 6, predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Fire Intensity predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Fire type predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Communities At Risk From Wildland Fire of Idaho BLM REA NGB 2011 Fsim Burn Probability in Pygmy Rabbit Habitat BLM REA NGB 2011 Fsim Burn Probability in Greater sage-grouse PPH BLM REA NWP 2011 FI C 2003 MTBS BLM REA NWP 2011 FI C 2006 MTBS BLM REA MBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Inter-Mountain Basins Big Curly Leaf Mountain Mahogany Woodland and Shrubland BLM REA MBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Columbian Sharp Tailed Grouse BLM REA MBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Bald Eagle BLM REA MBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Brewers Sparrow (Breeding) BLM REA CBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Mule Deer Class F Year Round BLM REA CBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Desert Tortoise Mojave Population BLM REA CBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Mojave Rattlesnake BLM REA CBR 2010 Modeled Future Bioclimate 2050 - Gila Monster GNLCC Refugia Project Sampled Fires