Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: partyWithName: Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas (X)

85 results (51ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
Riparian Understory final models (one with tamarisk included, the other without tamarisk). For more detailed information, please visit this project's ScienceBase landing page at https://doi.org/10.5066/P927I36K, or the final report for this project at https://www.coloradomesa.edu/water-center/documents/rasmussen_shaftroth_2016_watercenter_cmu.pdf.
Final model of estimated cost of restoration plus all model component layers. For more detailed information, please visit this project's ScienceBase landing page at https://doi.org/10.5066/P927I36K, or the final report for this project at https://www.coloradomesa.edu/water-center/documents/rasmussen_shaftroth_2016_watercenter_cmu.pdf.
thumbnail
This dataset represents the presence/absence of non-native, woody and herbaceous cover types in vegetation patches, as mapped from high resolution imagery from 2010. Each type (woody or herbaceous) requires different techniques, equipment and approaches, impacting treatment costs. This mapping was conducted as part of the Colorado River Conservation Planning Project, a joint effort between the National Park Service, The Nature Conservancy, US Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management, and Utah Forestry Fire and State Lands.
thumbnail
This dataset represents the prevalence of native trees as mapped along the Colorado River bottomland from the Colorado state line (San Juan and Grand Counties, Utah) to the southern Canyonlands NP boundary, as of September 2010. This mapping was conducted as part of the Colorado River Conservation Planning Project, a joint effort between the National Park Service, The Nature Conservancy, US Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management, and Utah Forestry Fire and State Lands.
thumbnail
This dataset represents the prevalence of tamarisk as mapped along the Colorado River bottomland from the Colorado state line (San Juan and Grand Counties, Utah) to the southern Canyonlands NP boundary, as of September 2010. photos, this cover layer reflects conditions that existed when the imagery was collected (September, 2010). This mapping was conducted as part of the Colorado River Conservation Planning Project, a joint effort between the National Park Service, The Nature Conservancy, US Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management, and Utah Forestry Fire and State Lands.
thumbnail
This is a fire risk model for riparian trees on the Colorado River bottomland in Utah. The model incorporates the prevalence of riparian trees and tamarisk, and proximity to human caused ignition sources (campgrounds and roads). See Open File Report, Rasmussen and Shafroth, Colorado River Conservation Planning, for geoprocessing details.
Layers used in construction of the General Diversity Model. For more detailed information, please visit this project's ScienceBase landing page at https://doi.org/10.5066/P927I36K, or the final report for this project at https://www.coloradomesa.edu/water-center/documents/rasmussen_shaftroth_2016_watercenter_cmu.pdf.
Riparian Overstory final models (one with tamarisk included, the other without tamarisk). For more detailed information, please visit this project's ScienceBase landing page at https://doi.org/10.5066/P927I36K, or the final report for this project at https://www.coloradomesa.edu/water-center/documents/rasmussen_shaftroth_2016_watercenter_cmu.pdf.
All layers used in construction of the Bat Feeding Model. For more detailed information, please visit this project's ScienceBase landing page at https://doi.org/10.5066/P927I36K, or the final report for this project at https://www.coloradomesa.edu/water-center/documents/rasmussen_shaftroth_2016_watercenter_cmu.pdf.
thumbnail
This dataset represents the variety (count of unique classes within 1 ha) of vegetation communities, river channel and bare areas (often sand bars) mapped along the Colorado River bottomland from the Colorado state line (San Juan and Grand Counties, Utah) to the southern Canyonlands NP boundary, as of September 2010. Traditional image interpretation cues were used to develop the polygons, such as shape, size, pattern, tone, texture, color, and shadow, from high resolution, true color, aerial imagery (0.3m resolution), acquired for the project. Additional, public available aerial photos (NAIP, 2011) were used to cross-reference cover classes. As with any digital layer, this layer is a representation of what is actually...
thumbnail
This dataset represents the relative abundance of non-native, woody cover types in vegetation patches, as mapped from high resolution imagery from 2010. This mapping was conducted as part of the Colorado River Conservation Planning Project, a joint effort between the National Park Service, The Nature Conservancy, US Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management, and Utah Forestry Fire and State Lands.
thumbnail
This is a model of the relative costs of restoration for of vegetation communities of the Colorado River bottomland in Utah. The model incorporates the prevalence of woody and herbaceous non-native species, difficulty of access to bottomland areas, and presence of woody and/or herbaceous non-native species. See Open File Report, Rasmussen and Shafroth, Colorado River Conservation Planning for geoprocessing details.
thumbnail
This is a model of the potential for natural recovery in vegetation communities of the Colorado River bottomland in Utah. The model incorporates the prevalence of native species, areas inundated in high flow conditions, and the prevalence of non-native species. See Open File Report, Rasmussen and Shafroth, Colorado River Conservation Planning for geoprocessing details.
thumbnail
This dataset represents the variety (count of unique classes within 0.5 ha) of vegetation communities, river channel and bare areas (often sand bars) mapped along the Colorado River bottomland from the Colorado state line (San Juan and Grand Counties, Utah) to the southern Canyonlands NP boundary, as of September 2010. Traditional image interpretation cues were used to develop the polygons, such as shape, size, pattern, tone, texture, color, and shadow, from high resolution, true color, aerial imagery (0.3m resolution), acquired for the project. Additional, public available aerial photos (NAIP, 2011) were used to cross-reference cover classes. As with any digital layer, this layer is a representation of what is...
Final models for riparian understory plus all model component layers. For more detailed information, please visit this project's ScienceBase landing page at https://doi.org/10.5066/P927I36K, or the final report for this project at https://www.coloradomesa.edu/water-center/documents/rasmussen_shaftroth_2016_watercenter_cmu.pdf.
Final model for bat feeding. For more detailed information, please visit this project's ScienceBase landing page at https://doi.org/10.5066/P927I36K, or the final report for this project at https://www.coloradomesa.edu/water-center/documents/rasmussen_shaftroth_2016_watercenter_cmu.pdf.
thumbnail
We mapped surface water from high resolution photography taken on September 16, 2010, at a stream flow of 96.5 m3/s (3,410 ft3/s, Cisco gage). We subdivided surface water into six categories: primary channel, secondary channel, split flow channel, backwater, isolated pool, and tributary channel, similar to that of fish habitat methods used extensively in Oregon. Channel types that are not primary channel are considered ‘off-channel’.
thumbnail
This is a habitat suitability model for bat feeding in the Colorado River bottomland in Utah. The model incorporates distance to water, stillness of adjacent water, and the variety of dominant cover types within 0.5 ha radius. See Open File Report, Rasmussen and Shafroth, Colorado River Conservation Planning for geoprocessing details.
thumbnail
This dataset represents relative patch size of riparian trees as mapped along the Colorado River bottomland from the Colorado state line (San Juan and Grand Counties, Utah) to the southern Canyonlands NP boundary, as of September 2010. This mapping was conducted as part of the Colorado River Conservation Planning Project, a joint effort between the National Park Service, The Nature Conservancy, US Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management, and Utah Forestry Fire and State Lands.
thumbnail
This is a habitat suitability model for snakes that prefer the rocky boundaries of the bottomland of the Colorado River in Utah. The model incorporates distance to water, distance to the bottomland boundary, diversity of woody cover, and diversity of cover types within a 50 sq meter areas. See Open File Report, Rasmussen and Shafroth, Colorado River Conservation Planning for geoprocessing details.


map background search result map search result map Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Bat Feeding Model Output Data for Colorado River in Utah Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Diversity of Cover Types for Bat Feeding Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Diversity of All Cover Types for General Diversity Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Size of Tree Patch for Riparian Overstory Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Rocky Fringe Snakes Model Output Data for Colorado River in Utah Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Structural Types of Non-Native Species for Relative Cost of Restoration Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Density of Non-Native, Woody Species for Relative Cost of Restoration Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Relative Cost of Restoration Model Output Data for Colorado River in Utah Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Density of Native Riparian Trees for Fire Risk Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Density of Tamarisk for Fire Risk Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Fire Risk Model with Human Ignition Sources Output Data for Colorado River in Utah Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Potential for Natural Recovery Model Model Output Data for Colorado River in Utah Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - 2010 Low Flow Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - 2010 Low Flow Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Structural Types of Non-Native Species for Relative Cost of Restoration Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Density of Non-Native, Woody Species for Relative Cost of Restoration Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Potential for Natural Recovery Model Model Output Data for Colorado River in Utah Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Relative Cost of Restoration Model Output Data for Colorado River in Utah Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Rocky Fringe Snakes Model Output Data for Colorado River in Utah Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Diversity of All Cover Types for General Diversity Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Diversity of Cover Types for Bat Feeding Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Bat Feeding Model Output Data for Colorado River in Utah Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Size of Tree Patch for Riparian Overstory Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Density of Tamarisk for Fire Risk Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Density of Native Riparian Trees for Fire Risk Model Conservation Planning for the Colorado River in Utah - Fire Risk Model with Human Ignition Sources Output Data for Colorado River in Utah