Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: {"scheme":"Data Basin"} (X)

9,686 results (133ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
Zone 21 (covering parts of Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota) of the contiguous U.S. percent developed imperviousness dataset from NLCD 2006, released 2/16/2011. The full dataset is divided into 25 zones, which can all be found in the NLCD 2006 gallery. The National Land Cover Database products are created through a cooperative project conducted by the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium. The MRLC Consortium is a partnership of federal agencies (www.mrlc.gov), consisting of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S. Forest Service (USFS),...
thumbnail
Zone 15 (covering parts of South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) of the contiguous U.S. percent developed imperviousness dataset from NLCD 2006, released 2/16/2011. The full dataset is divided into 25 zones, which can all be found in the NLCD 2006 gallery. The National Land Cover Database products are created through a cooperative project conducted by the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium. The MRLC Consortium is a partnership of federal agencies (www.mrlc.gov), consisting of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),...
thumbnail
Zone 5 (covering parts of California and Nevada) of the contiguous U.S. percent developed imperviousness dataset from NLCD 2006, released 2/16/2011. The full dataset is divided into 25 zones, which can all be found in the NLCD 2006 gallery. The National Land Cover Database products are created through a cooperative project conducted by the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium. The MRLC Consortium is a partnership of federal agencies (www.mrlc.gov), consisting of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), the National...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, above ground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, above ground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, above ground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, above ground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...


map background search result map search result map National Land Cover Database 2006 (U.S.) - percent developed imperviousness, zone 21 National Land Cover Database 2006 (U.S.) - percent developed imperviousness, zone 15 National Land Cover Database 2006 (U.S.) - percent developed imperviousness, zone 5 Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADGEM1 climate, no deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2040s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADGEM1 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADGEM1 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and fire scenarios (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADCM3 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CCSM 3.0 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2020s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CCSM 3.0 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under MPI ECHAM5 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under ECHO-G climate, no deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2080s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM 4 climate and GOVernance deforestation scenarios with no fire (2040s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM 4 climate and GOVernance deforestation scenarios with no fire (2020s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM 4 climate scenario and current deforestation with no fire (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and no fire scenarios (2040s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2040s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate and GOVernance deforestation scenarios with fire (2020s) National Land Cover Database 2006 (U.S.) - percent developed imperviousness, zone 15 National Land Cover Database 2006 (U.S.) - percent developed imperviousness, zone 5 National Land Cover Database 2006 (U.S.) - percent developed imperviousness, zone 21 Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADGEM1 climate, no deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2040s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADGEM1 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADGEM1 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and fire scenarios (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADCM3 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CCSM 3.0 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2020s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CCSM 3.0 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under MPI ECHAM5 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under ECHO-G climate, no deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2080s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM 4 climate and GOVernance deforestation scenarios with no fire (2040s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM 4 climate and GOVernance deforestation scenarios with no fire (2020s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM 4 climate scenario and current deforestation with no fire (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and no fire scenarios (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and no fire scenarios (2040s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2040s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate and GOVernance deforestation scenarios with fire (2020s)