Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: Grand County, Utah (X) > Types: Map Service (X)

23 results (50ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
These layers show the relative abundance of native, non-native and tree cover types as mapped for the Colorado River Conservation Planning Project. Relative abundance (Dominant, Common, Mapped by Sparse and Not Mapped) is determined by the listing of cover types per patch.
thumbnail
This set of maps shows relative habitat diversity (complexity) as it relates to the number of different dominant cover types are found in 1 hectare, and the number of structural types found in 1 hectare. Component layers are included, as are layers of channel boundaries, reaches, and bottomland kilometers.
thumbnail
This set of maps shows relative habitat quality for snakes that prefer the rocky outside margin of the bottomland area. Component layers (type and count of cover types, distance to bottomland boundary and distance to permanent water) are included, as are associated layers of channel boundaries, reaches, and bottomland kilometers.
thumbnail
Sandstone ledges and slopes of the lower part of the Kayenta formation at Big Hole, on the Colorado River 8 miles east of Cisco. The top of the cliff formed by the Wingate sandstone is shown toward the left at the bottom of the picture. Grand County, Utah. November 1927. Plate 8-A, in U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 183. Plate 10-B, in U.S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 863, 1935.
thumbnail
This collection of maps shows relative habitat quality for a suite of species that use riparian overstory habitats. Component layers include: tree patch size, presence and complexity of riparian understory, and abundance of tamarisk. Associated layers such as river channels at high flow and bottomland reaches are included for reference.
thumbnail
This collection of maps shows fluvial geomorphic features of the Colorado River bottomland including river channel boundaries at high flow (31,300 cubic ft/sec on 06/28/2011 at the Cisco gage) and at lower flow (3,410 cubic ft/sec on 09/06/2010 at the Cisco gage). Also shown is the bottomland boundary delineating the currently active fluvial surface; the bottomland is subdivided by both reaches and bottomland kilometers for reference. Centerlines for the bottomland and 2010 river channel are included, also.
thumbnail
This set of maps shows relative habitat quality for species that prefer open areas. Component layers (herbacoeus areas, distance to high water) are included, as are associated layers of channel boundaries, reaches, and bottomland kilometers.
thumbnail
These layers show some of the human interactions with the bottomland area. Recreation sites, roads, fuel treatment areas, and river camp layers were all acquired from project partners or publically available data and clipped to or near the bottomland boundary for use here. Bottomland reaches, kilometers, 2010 channel layers were created for the Colorado River Conservation Planning project.
thumbnail
This set of maps shows relative habitat quality for riparian understory species, both with and without a penalty applied for abundant tamarisk. Component layers are included, as are complementary layers of channel boundaries, reaches, and bottomland kilometers.
thumbnail
Intricate cross bedding in the Entrada sandstone, in the northern part of sec. 5, T. 21 S., R. 23 E., about 8 miles northeast of Cisco; the white sandstone at the top is the lower part of the Moab sandstone member. Grand County, Utah. November 1927. Plate 18-D, in U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 183. Plate 14-A, in U.S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 863, 1935.
thumbnail
This collection of maps shows vegetation cover types that are either Dominant or Common (see project documentation for full methodology in mapping). Sparse cover types are not shown here. All patches have a dominant cover type, but not all have a Common type. Vegetation features were mapped by National Park Service staff; ground-truthing and editing of vegetation data was done by project staff, as was mapping of bare areas and channel features. Associated layers of river channels, reaches, and bottomland kilometers are included for reference.
thumbnail
This set of maps shows relative habitat quality for bat watering. Component layers (distance to water, vegetation cover types, open flight areas) are included, as are complementary layers of channel boundaries, reaches, and bottomland kilometers.
thumbnail
Album caption and index card: Canyons of Green River. Dellenbaugh Butte, near the mouth of San Rafael. Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. ca. 1871. (Stereoscopic view) (Photo same as J.K. Hillers no. 585, hjk00585)
thumbnail
Album caption and index card: Canyons of Green River. Tump-in-kon-tu-weap. Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. ca. 1871. (Stereoscopic view) (Photo similar to J.K. Hillers no. 736, hjk00736)
thumbnail
Wingate sandstone and underlying softer Chinle shale exposed at Big Hole on the Colorado River 8 miles east of Cisco, note the extensive horizontal softer beds in the Wingate sandstone and the cross-bedding within the thicker sandstone beds. sec. 8 T. 21 S., R. 23 E. Grand County, Utah. October 1927. Plate 6-B, in U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 183. 1936. Plate 9-A, in U.S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 863, 1935.
map background search result map search result map Wingate sandstone and underlying softer Chinle shale exposed at Big Hole on the Colorado River 8 miles east of Cisco. Grand County, Utah. October 1927. Sandstone ledges and slopes of the lower part of the Kayenta formation at Big Hole. Grand County, Utah. 1927. Intricate cross bedding in the Entrada sandstone. Grand County, Utah. 1927. Trinalcove, Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871. River view in Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871. Tump-in-kon-tu-weap, Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871. Tump-in-kon-tu-weap, Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871. Dellenbaugh Butte, near the mouth of San Rafael. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871. The Book Cliffs near Green River. Grand County, Utah. No date. Riparian Overstory Model and Component Layers Riparian Understory Model and Component Layers General Diversity Model and Component Layers Bat Watering Model and Component Layers Open Land Species Model and Component Layers Rocky Fringe Snakes Model and Component Layers Vegetation Mapping of Dominant and Common Cover Types Fluvial Geomorphic Features Native, Non-native and Tree Abundance Human Features on the Colorado River Bottomland WMR 012 - Thompson Magnesium Well. Grand County, Utah. 1942. General Diversity Model and Component Layers Bat Watering Model and Component Layers Open Land Species Model and Component Layers Rocky Fringe Snakes Model and Component Layers Riparian Understory Model and Component Layers Riparian Overstory Model and Component Layers Vegetation Mapping of Dominant and Common Cover Types Fluvial Geomorphic Features Native, Non-native and Tree Abundance Wingate sandstone and underlying softer Chinle shale exposed at Big Hole on the Colorado River 8 miles east of Cisco. Grand County, Utah. October 1927. Sandstone ledges and slopes of the lower part of the Kayenta formation at Big Hole. Grand County, Utah. 1927. Intricate cross bedding in the Entrada sandstone. Grand County, Utah. 1927. The Book Cliffs near Green River. Grand County, Utah. No date. WMR 012 - Thompson Magnesium Well. Grand County, Utah. 1942. Human Features on the Colorado River Bottomland Trinalcove, Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871. River view in Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871. Tump-in-kon-tu-weap, Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871. Tump-in-kon-tu-weap, Labyrinth Canyon. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871. Dellenbaugh Butte, near the mouth of San Rafael. Grand and Emery Counties, Utah. circa 1871.