Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: Tags (X)

2 results (45ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
Brief Methods Summary for Potential_Wilderness_Additions_2011_w_Criteria.shp By John Gallo; May 17, 2011 All quantitative data are from the Regional Conservation Guide I took M1Orig from the [RCG1_0_No_tht] file and intersected with the Potential Wilderness layer (Provided by CWC). Did that for the other Ms too. (M1=Species Hotspots, M2=Habitat Representation, M4 = WildLands, M6 = Connectivity between Wildlands). I used the inverse of the ecological integrity index for 2000 to be an indication of restoration potential (For instance, a PWA that currently allows grazing would get a very low score for ECI, and incidentally for Wildlands value, but arguably a high score for restoration potential). I used [eci00_minus50]...
Tags: tags
thumbnail
based on: eci_00minus50 see Regional Conservation Guide. I think Figure 22 or 23 also has a brief description about this layer.
    map background search result map search result map Potential_Wilderness_Additions_NAD835N Estimated Threat for the next 50 years. Potential_Wilderness_Additions_NAD835N Estimated Threat for the next 50 years.