Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: dynamic global vegetation model (X)

619 results (101ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, above ground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, above ground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, above ground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, aboveground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
thumbnail
The integrity of Amazon forests are currently threatened by climate change, deforestation, and fire. However, it is unclear how these agents of change interact over large spatial and temporal domains and reducing this uncertainty is important for projecting changes in carbon stocks and species biogeography, and could better inform continental scale conservation programs. With this in mind, above ground biomass and tree cover data were produced using the dynamic global vegetation model, LPJmL, with 9 different global climate models (using the SRES A2 emissions storyline) and 2 different deforestation scenarios (from Soares et al.). The existing fire module was modified to include 'escaped fire' associated with deforestation,...
Abstract (from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138759): Future climate change may significantly alter the distributions of many plant taxa. The effects of climate change may be particularly large in mountainous regions where climate can vary significantly with elevation. Understanding potential future vegetation changes in these regions requires methods that can resolve vegetation responses to climate change at fine spatial resolutions. We used LPJ, a dynamic global vegetation model, to assess potential future vegetation changes for a large topographically complex area of the northwest United States and southwest Canada (38.0–58.0°N latitude by 136.6–103.0°W longitude). LPJ is a...
thumbnail
This dataset represents the average carbon consumed by fire for each HUC5 watershed, simulated by the model MC1 for the 30-year period 1971-2000. Carbon in biomass consumed by fire, in g m-2 yr-1, was determined for each HUC5 watershed. Watersheds represent 5th level (HUC5, 10-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries and were acquired from the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Background: The dynamic global vegetation model MC1 (see Bachelet et al. 2001) was used to simulate vegetation dynamics, associated carbon and nitrogen cycle, water budget, and wild fire impacts for OR, WA, OR and WA, for a project funded by the USDA Forest Service (PNW 09-JV-11261900-003). The MC1 model was run using historical data...
thumbnail
This dataset represents the average annual precipitation for each HUC5 watershed, simulated by the model MC1 for the 30-year period 1971-2000. Mean annual precipitation (in mm H2O yr-1), was determined for each HUC5 watershed by averaging values of original ~ 4 km raster data. Watersheds represent 5th level (HUC5, 10-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries and were acquired from the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Background: The dynamic global vegetation model MC1 (see Bachelet et al.2001) was used to simulate vegetation dynamics, associated carbon and nitrogen cycle, water budget, and wild fire impacts for OR, WA, AZ and NM, for a project funded by the USDA Forest Service (PNW09-JV-11261900-003). The MC1...
thumbnail
This dataset represents the historical majority vegetation type (30 year mode), for each HUC5 watershed, simulated by the model MC1 for the 30-year period 1971-2000. Majority vegetation type was determined for each HUC5 watershed by calculating the 30 year mode from original ~ 4 km raster data. Watersheds represent 5th level (HUC5, 10-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries and were acquired from the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Background: The dynamic global vegetation model MC1 (see Bachelet et al.2001) was used to simulate vegetation dynamics, associated carbon and nitrogen cycle, water budget, a nd wild fire impacts for OR, WA, AZ and NM, for a project funded by the USDA Forest Service (PNW09-JV-11261900-003)....


map background search result map search result map Simulated average carbon consumed by fire (1971-2000) for OR and WA, USA Simulated historical annual precipitation (1971-2000) for OR and WA, USA Simulated historical majority vegetation type (1971-2000: 30 yr mode) for OR and WA, USA Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under MPI ECHAM 5 climate scenario and current deforestation with fire (2000s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADCM3 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2040s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADCM3 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and fire scenarios (2000s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and no fire scenarios (2000s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under GFDL CM2 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2020s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate scenario and no deforestation with fire (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2020s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate scenario and current deforestation with fire (2040s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate scenario and current deforestation (BAU) and no fire scenarios (2040s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under GFDL CM2 1 climate scenario with no deforestation with no fire (2040s) Percent change in aboveground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate scenario under a fire with no deforestation scenario (2000s) Percent change in aboveground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under CRU climate scenario and GOVernance deforestation with no fire (2080s) Percent change in aboveground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under CRU climate scenario and GOVernance deforestation with no fire (2020s) Simulated average carbon consumed by fire (1971-2000) for OR and WA, USA Simulated historical annual precipitation (1971-2000) for OR and WA, USA Simulated historical majority vegetation type (1971-2000: 30 yr mode) for OR and WA, USA Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under MPI ECHAM 5 climate scenario and current deforestation with fire (2000s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADCM3 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2040s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under UKMO HADCM3 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and fire scenarios (2000s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under IPSL CM4 climate, current deforestation (BAU), and no fire scenarios (2000s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under GFDL CM2 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2020s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate scenario and no deforestation with fire (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2060s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate, no deforestation, and fire scenarios (2020s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under GISS climate scenario and current deforestation with fire (2040s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate, GOVernance deforestation, and fire scenarios (2080s) Aboveground biomass (Mg C/ha) for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate scenario and current deforestation (BAU) and no fire scenarios (2040s) Percent change in above ground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under GFDL CM2 1 climate scenario with no deforestation with no fire (2040s) Percent change in aboveground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under CSIRO MK3 climate scenario under a fire with no deforestation scenario (2000s) Percent change in aboveground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under CRU climate scenario and GOVernance deforestation with no fire (2080s) Percent change in aboveground tree cover for the Amazon Basin under CRU climate scenario and GOVernance deforestation with no fire (2020s)