Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: grasslands (X) > Extensions: ArcGIS Service Definition (X)

10 results (53ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
Rental rates for non-irrigated cropland in 2016, clipped to Midwest Grasslands Network Focal Area
thumbnail
Project boundary for the Southwest Wisconsin Grasslands Network, updated 8/27/19 by Kelly VanBeek, USFWS, using TIGER/Line geodatabase data from 2018.
thumbnail
These heatmaps show a top 3 stressor or service, as ranked by participants, and the concentration of participants who reported as working in each municipality or county who also voted for that stressor or service across the landscape. This map shows the percentage of participants from each county and municipality who ranked Lehmman Lovegrass as a top 3 ecosystem stressor in the Grassland Invasive Plant category in their region. Symbology represents the percentage of participants with 0% = dark green, 0.0001 % - 24.99% = light green, 25% - 49.99% = yellow, 50% - 74.99% = orange, 75% - 100% = red. All counties and municipalities identified by participants as areas where they work were given a tally for each of the...
thumbnail
These heatmaps show a top 3 stressor or service, as ranked by participants, and the concentration of participants who reported as working in each municipality or county who also voted for that stressor or service across the landscape. This map shows the percentage of participants from each county and municipality who ranked Soil Degradation and Salinization as a top 3 ecosystem stressor in the Grassland Ecosystem Function category in their region. Symbology represents the percentage of participants with 0% = dark green, 0.0001 % - 24.99% = light green, 25% - 49.99% = yellow, 50% - 74.99% = orange, 75% - 100% = red. All counties and municipalities identified by participants as areas where they work were given a tally...
thumbnail
The Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan (2016) identified opportunity scores for eight grassland natural community types in each ecological landscape of Wisconsin. This collection of spatial datasets summarizes and displays these opportunity scores. Grassland natural community types include: dry prairie, dry-mesic prairie, mesic prairie, wet-mesic prairie, wet prairie, sand prairie, bracken grassland, and surrogate grassland
thumbnail
Conservation Opportunity Areas (COA) are intended to guide conservation activities at a landscape level. Landscape conservation is a developing theme across the country and throughout Indiana. Building off the successes of other Indiana landscape initiatives, like Goose Pond Fish and Wildlife Area and the Healthy Rivers Initiative, Indiana DFW has identified opportunities on the landscape to focus conservation efforts over the next decade. These COA were identified as a way to direct actions toward specific areas on Indiana’s landscape.
thumbnail
Grassland habitat conservation project areas and embedded grassland bird conservation areas in Wisconsin
thumbnail
These heatmaps show a top 3 stressor or service, as ranked by participants, and the concentration of participants who reported as working in each municipality or county who also voted for that stressor or service across the landscape. This map shows the percentage of participants from each county and municipality who ranked Feral Hogs (Sus scrofa) as a top 3 ecosystem stressor in the Grassland Invasive Animal category in their region. Symbology represents the percentage of participants with 0% = dark green, 0.0001 % - 24.99% = light green, 25% - 49.99% = yellow, 50% - 74.99% = orange, 75% - 100% = red. All counties and municipalities identified by participants as areas where they work were given a tally for each...
thumbnail
Monarch Conservation Planning Tool county summary dataset clipped to the Midwest Grasslands Network Focal Area. Please see https://www.umesc.usgs.gov/management/dss/monarch/desktop_monarch_conservation_planning_tools.html for more information and a user's manual that includes descriptions for attributes. Current view indicates percent change from pasture to cropland on a county basis.
thumbnail
These heatmaps show a top 3 stressor or service, as ranked by participants, and the concentration of participants who reported as working in each municipality or county who also voted for that stressor or service across the landscape.
    map background search result map search result map Wisconsin Grassland Conservation Areas Crop Rental Rates 2016 Indiana Grassland COAs Monarch Conservation Planning Tool Clip WI Ecological Landscapes and Natural Community Opportunity Scores SWGN Base Layers Grasslands - Habitat Fragmentation and Loss Stressor - Unsustainable Grazing Grasslands - Ecosystem Functionality Stressors - Soil Degradation and Salinization Grasslands - Invasive Animal Stressors - Feral Hogs (Sus Scrofa) Grasslands - Invasive and Problematic (Native and non-native) Plant Stressors - Lehmann Lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana) Indiana Grassland COAs Wisconsin Grassland Conservation Areas WI Ecological Landscapes and Natural Community Opportunity Scores SWGN Base Layers Grasslands - Invasive Animal Stressors - Feral Hogs (Sus Scrofa) Grasslands - Invasive and Problematic (Native and non-native) Plant Stressors - Lehmann Lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana) Grasslands - Habitat Fragmentation and Loss Stressor - Unsustainable Grazing Grasslands - Ecosystem Functionality Stressors - Soil Degradation and Salinization Crop Rental Rates 2016 Monarch Conservation Planning Tool Clip