Skip to main content

Evaluating the Relevance, Reliability, and Applicability of CMIP5 Climate Projections for Water Resources and Environmental Planning

Dates

Start Date
2013
End Date
2014

Contacts

Funding Agency :
Bureau of Reclamation
Principal Investigator :
Ian Ferguson
Co-Investigator :
USACE IWR, NOAA CIRES, NOAA ESRL, Reclamation MP

Attached Files

Purpose

This work proposed here addresses the following questions: How good are the model projection results from CMIP5 for water resources and environmental planning applications? What is the broadband of performance characteristics collectively relevant for these various applications? What are the components of a framework that structures this broadband of performance characteristics to support subsequent discussions on the applicability of CMIP5 projections in planning and assessment situations? How applicable are the CMIP model projections for water resources and environmental planning applications? How do we develop a general framework to judge information applicability that fletrueibly addresses unique aspects of a local planning and assessment situation? How do we determine relevant climate aspects within this framework? How do we evaluate the trustworthiness of projection information on these relevant climate aspects, leveraging the broadband performance characteristics framework developed under Question I?

Project Extension

parts
typeObjectives
valueThis work proposed here addresses the following questions: How good are the model projection results from CMIP5 for water resources and environmental planning applications? What is the broadband of performance characteristics collectively relevant for these various applications? What are the components of a framework that structures this broadband of performance characteristics to support subsequent discussions on the applicability of CMIP5 projections in planning and assessment situations? How applicable are the CMIP model projections for water resources and environmental planning applications? How do we develop a general framework to judge information applicability that fletrueibly addresses unique aspects of a local planning and assessment situation? How do we determine relevant climate aspects within this framework? How do we evaluate the trustworthiness of projection information on these relevant climate aspects, leveraging the broadband performance characteristics framework developed under Question I?
projectProducts
statusExpected
projectStatusIn Progress

Communities

  • Other Project Community

Tags

Provenance

Data source
File Processing
Added to ScienceBase on Thu Aug 08 09:27:17 MDT 2013 by processing file <b>Reclamation_18July13-1.xlsx</b>
File Process
Type
Excel
Reference Item
Bureau of Reclamation

Additional Information

Expando Extension

object
agendas
nameNorthwest CSC Agenda
themes
nameClimate Science & Modeling
number1
options
atrue
nameResponse of Physical Systems to Climate Change
number2
options
nameResponse of Biological Systems to Climate Change
number3
options
nameVulnerability and Adaptation
number4
options
nameMonitoring and Observation Systems
number5
options
nameData, Infrastructure, Analysis, and Modeling
number6
options
nameCommunication of Science Findings
number7
options
btrue
urlhttp://www.doi.gov/csc/northwest/upload/NW-CSC-Science-Agenda-2012-2015.pdf

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...