Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Categories: Publication (X) > Tags: {"scheme":"https://www.sciencebase.gov/vocab/category/Landscape%20Patterns%20Catalog/ScaleKeywords","name":"site"} (X)

2 results (151ms)   

Filters
Date Range
Extensions (Less)
Types (Less)
Contacts (Less)
Tag Types
Tags (with Scheme=https://www.sciencebase.gov/vocab/category/Landscape%20Patterns%20Catalog/ScaleKeywords)
View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
Conclusions:Generally, mimimum buffer widths may help maintain natural physical and chemical characteristics of resources whereas greater buffer widths may be required to maintain biological components of many wetlands and streams. Fixed width buffers do not consider site-specific conditions, and therefore may not adequately buffer aquatic resources. Variable width buffers, albeit more site specific and effective, are more expensive and offer less predictability for planning purposes.Thresholds/Learnings:Stream buffers should be a minimum of 15 to 30m in width to be effective in protecting the ecological integrity of wetlands and streams.
Conclusions:Over time, native species richness increased slightly, but dropped dramatically after several years of burning. Year-to-year change in community composition was found to be affected by time since fire and fluctuations in growing season temperature and rainfall. Examining successional trajectory showed that the restoration has been most successful at reducing exotic species and increasing species heterogeneity, but has largely failed to increase native species richness at the level of remnant prairies, largely due to interspecies resource competition.Thresholds/Learnings: