Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: {"scheme":"ISO 19115 Topic Categories","name":"inlandwaters"} (X) > Types: Downloadable (X) > Types: ArcGIS Service Definition (X) > Types: OGC WMS Layer (X)

8 results (201ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
This data release provides the georeferenced boundaries that delimit each spatial unit of the Great Lakes Regional Aquatic Gap Analysis Project (GLGap) Coastal Hydrospatial Framework at each spatial scale from the local 90m cell to the entire Laurentian Great Lakes system and from the shoreline to the deepest offshore waters. The U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service collaborated to design a universal framework of spatial areas that encompass all space of the Laurentian Great Lakes proper. Agglomeration of the finest units (90m cells) form coarser, broader scale units. Finer units are nested within the coarser units at six spatial scales, labeled as Local Cells, Aquatic Habitat Areas, Coastal...
thumbnail
Collection of 3 assessments for Mainstem Big Rivers. The Condition Index ranks stream segments according to how well they meet the Desired State described qualitatively and quantitatively in the draft Integrated Science Agenda (v4). From the Condition Index 2 assessments are derived that rank opportunities for management and restoration of conditions included in the Condition Index – In-stream habitat diversity (also related to flow), and floodplain/riparian conditions. In-stream management opportunities are based on watershed-level (HUC12) scores for habitat diversity, sinuosity and impoundment conditions such that river segments meeting all desired states are considered Maintenance opportunities (values 5-6)....
thumbnail
The purpose of this data set is support resource allocation decisions (i.e. where to invest conservation effort) within the Gulf Coastal Plains and Ozarks Landscape Conservation Cooperative. It represents a relative ranking of HUC12 watersheds according to the quantity and quality of habitat as described in the GCPO LCC’s draft Integrated Science Agenda (v4). Watersheds (HUC12) were ranked by calculating the length-weighted average Management Opportunity scores within them. Because the 3 actions are identical for Med/Low-gradient Streams & Rivers of the coastal plains and Upland Streams & Rivers, (and because some watersheds contain both system types), we considered these systems simultaneously and calculated only...


    map background search result map search result map Percent catchment under crop-rivers Density of upstream dams_rivers Amount of inflow stored in upstream dams-rivers Anthropogenic sediment yield Combined Med/Low-gradient & Upland Streams & Rivers Watershed Ranks Mainstem Big Rivers Grouped Assessments Hydrospatial Framework for the Laurentian Great Lakes PRMS_Model_IHA_Metrics_Median_Future_Difference Mainstem Big Rivers Grouped Assessments Combined Med/Low-gradient & Upland Streams & Rivers Watershed Ranks Hydrospatial Framework for the Laurentian Great Lakes Percent catchment under crop-rivers Density of upstream dams_rivers Amount of inflow stored in upstream dams-rivers Anthropogenic sediment yield PRMS_Model_IHA_Metrics_Median_Future_Difference