Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: Wildfire (X) > Types: ArcGIS REST Map Service (X)

38 results (15ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
Fire type predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area with five classes: 1) shrub vegetation with torching flames; 2) shrub vegetation without torching flames; 3) forest with torching flames; 4) forest without torching flames; 5) grass or non-vegetation. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model...
thumbnail
This map shows current, near-term, and long-term estimates of fire occurrence potential due to human and natural causes. These estimates were developed using a Maxent model of 30 years of human and natural fire occurrences predicted against a variety of surfaces including elevation, lightning density, distance to roads and urban areas, vegetation type, and climate. The only factors that were varied to create the near and long-term estimates were climate.
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 6 (FIL6) with flame lengths in the range of 3.7-15 m predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5...
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) raster dataset predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathway.
thumbnail
Fire Intensity raster dataset predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathway.
thumbnail
Federal wildfire managers often want to know, over large landscapes, where wildfires are likely to occur and how intense they may be. To meet this need we developed a map that we call wildfire hazard potential (WHP) – a raster geospatial product that can help to inform evaluations of wildfire risk or prioritization of fuels management needs across very large spatial scales (millions of acres). Our specific objective with the WHP map was to depict the relative potential for wildfire that would be difficult for suppression resources to contain. To create the 2014 version, we built upon spatial estimates of wildfire likelihood and intensity generated in 2014 with the Large Fire Simulation system (FSim) for the national...
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 4 (FIL4) with flame lengths in the range of 1.8-2.4 m predicted for the 2020-2040 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the...
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 5 (FIL5) with flame lengths in the range of 2.4-3.7 m predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the...
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 2 (FIL2) with flame lengths in the range of 0.6-1.2 m predicted for the 2080-2100 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the...
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 2 (FIL2) with flame lengths in the range of 0.6-1.2 m predicted for the 2020-2040 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the...
thumbnail
Conditional Flame Length (CFL) is an estimate of the mean flame lengths for each pixel, and was predicted for the 2080-2100 period in the Rio Grande area using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathway. CFL...
thumbnail
Fire Intensity raster dataset predicted for the 2080-2100 period in the Rio Grande area was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathway.
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 3 (FIL3) with flame lengths in the range of 1.2-1.8 m predicted for the 2020-2040 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the...
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 5 (FIL5) with flame lengths in the range of 2.4-3.7 m predicted for the 2020-2040 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the...
thumbnail
Conditional Flame Length (CFL) is an estimate of the mean flame lengths for each pixel, and was predicted for the 2020-2040 period in the Rio Grande area using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathway. CFL...
thumbnail
Fire Intensity raster dataset predicted for the 2020-2040 period in the Rio Grande area was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathway.
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 1 (FIL1) with flame lengths in the range of 0-0.6 m predicted for the 2020-2040 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the 8.5...
thumbnail
Burn probability (BP) for Fireline Intensity Class 3 (FIL3) with flame lengths in the range of 1.2-1.8 m predicted for the 2050-2070 period in the Rio Grande area. This raster dataset was generated using: 1) data developed from the 2014 Fire Program Analysis (FPA) system; 2) geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the US Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk (Finney et al. 2011); and 3) climate predictions developed using the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method (Abatzoglou and Brown 2011) which downscaled model output from the GFDL-ESM-2m global climate model of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project 5 for the...


map background search result map search result map Colorado Plateau REA MQ E2: Where are the areas with potential to change from wildfire? Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 1, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 2, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 2, predicted for 2080 to 2100 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 3, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 3, predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 4, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 5, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 5, predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 6, predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Conditional Flame Length predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Conditional Flame Length predicted for 2080 to 2100 for Rio Grande study area Fire Intensity predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Fire Intensity predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Fire Intensity predicted for 2080 to 2100 for Rio Grande study area Fire type predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Wildfire Hazard Potential Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 1, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 2, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 2, predicted for 2080 to 2100 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 3, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 3, predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 4, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 5, predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 5, predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability for Fireline Intensity Class 6, predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Conditional Flame Length predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Conditional Flame Length predicted for 2080 to 2100 for Rio Grande study area Fire Intensity predicted for 2020 to 2040 for Rio Grande study area Fire Intensity predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Fire Intensity predicted for 2080 to 2100 for Rio Grande study area Fire type predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Burn Probability predicted for 2050 to 2070 for Rio Grande study area Colorado Plateau REA MQ E2: Where are the areas with potential to change from wildfire? Wildfire Hazard Potential