Filters: Tags: Wildlife (X)
4,807 results (12ms)|
Filters
Date Range
Extensions
Types
Contacts
Categories
Tag Types
|
Core area risk is classified by the percent of aspen that is core area, summarized by township. Core area was defined as aspen greater than 60 m from nonforest edges and roads or railroads.
Mapping of terrestrial vertebrates focuses on linking a spatial representation of species-habitat matrices to geographic distribution. Each model is a combination of distribution from regional and state references in association with contiguous appropriate habitats. Ranges for all species were based on 8-digit HUCs. Habitats were based on a raster SWReGAP 1 acre MMU land cover data set, with hydrology habitats added in from USGS NHD dataset directly or through modeling. Habitat association information was obtained from various state, regional, and national references with updates from scientific literature. This portion of the Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project produced predicted habitat distribution maps for...
Ranks of landscape level ecological risks for pygmy rabbit, summarized by township, in the Wyoming Basin Rapid Ecoregional Assessment project area. Landscape level risk based on Terrestrial Development Index (TDI). Risk classes based on mean TDI score by township. Lowest risk corresponds to TDI less than 1, medium risk corresponds to TDI 1 to 3, Highest risk corresponds TDI greater than 3. See table 27.3 and appendix in the Wyoming Basin REA report at http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20151155 for additional details.
The potential effect of development on patch size was used as an index of fragmentation. Patch size was quantified for baseline conditions for pygmy rabbit. This provides a reference for comparing patch size for relatively undeveloped patches (Terrestrial Development Index scores less than or equal to 1 percent) of pygmy rabbit.
The Alaska BAER Earth Cover Classification served as an input regional vegetation map for the Vegetation Map of Northern, Western, and Interior Alaska. For more information on source datasets for the Vegetation Map of Northern, Western, and Interior Alaska, see: http://aknhp.uaa.alaska.edu/ecology/vegetation-map-and-classification-northern-western-and-interior-alaska/
This polygon feature class describes areas used for subsistence harvesting of moose in 2011 by surveyed households in Takotna, Alaska. This is a partial representation of areas used for resource harvesting in 2011.
This feature class describes areas used for subsistence harvesting of sheefish by surveyed households in Ruby, Alaska. This is a partial representation of areas used for resource harvesting.
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
This polygon feature class describes areas used for subsistence harvesting of brown bear in 2011 by surveyed households in McGrath, Alaska. This is a partial representation of areas used for resource harvesting in 2011.
This feature class describes areas used for subsistence harvesting of sheefish by surveyed households in Galena, Alaska. This is a partial representation of areas used for resource harvesting.
This points feature class describes areas used for subsistence harvesting of sheefish in 2011 by surveyed households in Anvik, Alaska. This is a partial representation of areas used for resource harvesting in 2011.
This feature class describes areas used for subsistence harvesting of moose in 2011 by surveyed households in Anvik, Alaska. This is a partial representation of areas used for resource harvesting in 2011.
The overall score was used to contrast the NGB ecoregion to highlight analysis units within bald eagle habitat based on the cumulative indicator score.
Types: Downloadable;
Tags: BLM,
Bald Eagle,
Bureau of Land Management,
Cumulative Indicator Score,
DOI,
This map contains:Aquatic Intactness results for the State of Utah and the Colorado Plateau Ecoregion, HUC6/12-Digit HUC resolution.Aquatic Species Intactness results clipped to 22 different species' distributions, showing the AI status/condition for each of these species of interest in Utah and the COP. An experimental Aquatic Intactness model for the Escalante subregion, which tests a methodology to incorporate detailed/specialized datasets available for only a portion of the study site into the model without penalizing no-data areas in the final intactness score. The Escalante experimental model utilizes two additional themes: riparian vegetation conversion and grazing impact. Unfortunately Grand Staircase National...
This map contains:Aquatic Intactness results for the State of Utah and the Colorado Plateau Ecoregion, HUC6/12-Digit HUC resolution.Aquatic Species Intactness results clipped to 22 different species' distributions, showing the AI status/condition for each of these species of interest in Utah and the COP. An experimental Aquatic Intactness model for the Escalante subregion, which tests a methodology to incorporate detailed/specialized datasets available for only a portion of the study site into the model without penalizing no-data areas in the final intactness score. The Escalante experimental model utilizes two additional themes: riparian vegetation conversion and grazing impact. Unfortunately Grand Staircase National...
Types: Live Data;
Tags: 1 km resolution,
BLM,
Bureau of Land Management,
COP 2014,
Colorado Plateau,
This map contains:Aquatic Intactness results for the State of Utah and the Colorado Plateau Ecoregion, HUC6/12-Digit HUC resolution.Aquatic Species Intactness results clipped to 22 different species' distributions, showing the AI status/condition for each of these species of interest in Utah and the COP. An experimental Aquatic Intactness model for the Escalante subregion, which tests a methodology to incorporate detailed/specialized datasets available for only a portion of the study site into the model without penalizing no-data areas in the final intactness score. The Escalante experimental model utilizes two additional themes: riparian vegetation conversion and grazing impact. Unfortunately Grand Staircase National...
Types: Live Data;
Tags: 1 km resolution,
BLM,
Bureau of Land Management,
COP 2014,
Colorado Pikeminnow,
These life history accounts and range maps represent updated versions of the species information in the three-volume set "California's Wildlife" edited by Zeiner, D.C. et al 1988-1990. There are also accounts for 48 more species here than in the original publication, bringing the total up to 694. The information was prepared under contract with the best available experts for various taxonomic groups. Authors and reviewers names appear on the individual life history accounts. Accounts were initially edited by Marshall White and, in later years, by California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) Program staff with the California Department of Fish and Game. Update dates are noted on individual life history accounts....
The potential effect of development on patch size was used as an index of fragmentation. Patch size was quantified for baseline conditions for Greater Sage Grouse. This provides a reference for comparing patch size for relatively undeveloped patches (Terrestrial Development Index scores less than or equal to 1 percent).
For more infomation about the moose 2005 waypoints dataset please contact Selawik National Wildlife Refuge.
These life history accounts and range maps represent updated versions of the species information in the three-volume set "California's Wildlife" edited by Zeiner, D.C. et al 1988-1990. There are also accounts for 48 more species here than in the original publication, bringing the total up to 694. The information was prepared under contract with the best available experts for various taxonomic groups. Authors and reviewers names appear on the individual life history accounts. Accounts were initially edited by Marshall White and, in later years, by California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) Program staff with the California Department of Fish and Game. Update dates are noted on individual life history accounts....
|
|
