Skip to main content

Greater sage-grouse population change (percent change) in a low oil and gas development, high population estimate scenario, and with no effects of climate change (2006-2062)

Dates

Publication Date
Start Date
2006
End Date
2062

Citation

Heinrichs, J.A., Aldridge, C., O'Donnell, M., Garman, S.L., and Homer, C., 2019, Influences of Potential Oil and Gas Development and Future Climate on Sage-Grouse Declines and Redistribution: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9GRF34E.

Summary

This data set defines boundaries of oil and gas project areas, greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) core areas, and non-core and non-project areas within the Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative (WLCI; southwestern Wyoming). Specifically, the data represents results from the manuscript “Combined influences of future oil and gas development and climate on potential Sage-grouse declines and redistribution” for low oil and gas development, high population size, and no climate component. The oil and gas development scenario were based on an energy footprint model that simulates well, pad, and road patterns for oil and gas recovery options that vary in well types (vertical and directional) and number of wells per pad and [...]

Contacts

Attached Files

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

Shapefile: GRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.zip
GRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.cpg 5 Bytes
GRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.dbf 67.64 KB
GRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.prj 432 Bytes
GRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.sbn 1.47 KB
GRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.sbx 268 Bytes
GRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.shp 1.84 MB
GRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.shx 1.07 KB

Purpose

The simulated changes in sage-grouse populations presented here can be used to inform management by: 1) understanding the possible range of effects of oil and gas development and future climate influences on sage-grouse habitat, 2) mapping scenarios of how sagebrush vegetation and sage-grouse habitat could change under alternative scenarios, and 3) indicating the degree to which different areas of the landscape could change. These data do not represent absolute predictions, rather they should be interpreted as possible relative differences.

Additional Information

Shapefile Extension

boundingBox
minY40.53593165541111
minX-111.55604248639743
maxY43.81583511962552
maxX-105.8741531231505
files
nameGRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.cpg
contentTypetext/plain
pathOnDisk__disk__63/55/e1/6355e1c321b34b0d93a551363b1bbcbc327f4b99
imageWidth580
imageHeight435
size5
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:14:13 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.dbf
contentTypetext/plain
pathOnDisk__disk__43/fe/e7/43fee72c6632089cd9e1ec4a010caed7b2d31b1f
imageWidth580
imageHeight435
size69262
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:14:13 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.prj
contentTypetext/plain
pathOnDisk__disk__b3/1c/3a/b31c3ae394ab88eb3b0ab40c9dd22ac515ac475c
imageWidth580
imageHeight435
size432
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:14:13 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.sbn
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__81/11/47/811147528839dbabd22a9965040878074d7e1da9
size1508
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:14:13 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.sbx
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__92/93/8b/92938b72f0149b348a6f673ac1baeba5ddb94b4f
size268
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:14:13 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.shp
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__85/08/e8/8508e8035679ee92bcddb29da130c54d5b6c877e
size1930312
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:14:15 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.shx
contentTypex-gis/x-shapefile
pathOnDisk__disk__0e/5c/c2/0e5cc2d1f44a6a6f1e9a1a02109140e03b711720
size1092
dateUploadedTue Feb 12 14:14:13 MST 2019
nameGRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop.shp.xml
contentTypeapplication/fgdc+xml
pathOnDisk__disk__5e/18/20/5e1820a15d964062c3f7abbfd682189bcf126f8a
dateUploadedThu Aug 20 07:29:48 MDT 2020
originalMetadatatrue
geometryTypeMultiPolygon
nameGRSGoccupancy_LowOG_HighPop

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...