As resource managers, policy makers, and citizens grapple with the effects of climate change, the demand for more usable or “actionable” science has increased. One promising approach to developing scientific information that can be easily and readily applied to management and policy decisions is to have scientists and decision makers work together to produce information. This approach, often referred to as the “co-production of knowledge”, integrates the background, experience, and know-how of each group to develop the scientific information that will be most useful to society. This project will test an approach to knowledge co-production by introducing a trained social scientist to a co-produced drought-related research project. [...]
Summary
As resource managers, policy makers, and citizens grapple with the effects of climate change, the demand for more usable or “actionable” science has increased. One promising approach to developing scientific information that can be easily and readily applied to management and policy decisions is to have scientists and decision makers work together to produce information. This approach, often referred to as the “co-production of knowledge”, integrates the background, experience, and know-how of each group to develop the scientific information that will be most useful to society.
This project will test an approach to knowledge co-production by introducing a trained social scientist to a co-produced drought-related research project. The objective of the social scientist will be to improve engagement with viticulturalists (wine grape growers) in order to spur discussion on how regional climate and weather events have affected different stages of their crops’ development. The scientist will be engaging with viticulturalists from the Southwest, a region where drought conditions are expected to become more severe. The goal of this project is to provide scientists and decision makers with tools to help them make their research more applicable and usable for addressing critical resource management questions in the face of a changing climate.
Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.
lightning_creek-USGS.jpg “Lightning Creek at Clark Fork, ID during 2015 drought - Credit: Ryan Smith, USGS”
394.16 KB
image/jpeg
Project Extension
parts
type
Technical Summary
value
Collaborative research approaches and co-production of knowledge show promise as ways to produce more usable science because they tend to increase decision makers’ trust in the information and tend to produce information better-suited to the decision-making environment. However, we lack sufficient information about specific practices, strategies and actions that are most effective and efficient in promoting co-production of climate science knowledge and/or producing actionable climate science knowledge. We propose to conduct quasi-experimental research in which we compare the processes, outcomes, and impacts of a deliberately co-produced drought/climate research project with other drought/climate projects using varying approaches to stakeholder engagement. We will use social science and evaluation research methods such as ethnographic document analysis, interviews, and participant observation to facilitate the co-production of one project and assess the process, outcomes, and impacts of comparable control projects. Results from this project will be relevant to investigators and leaders within the CSC network and other organizations seeking to produce usable climate science. Results will be shared via webinars, user-friendly summaries, and in small-group workshops to provide network members with a variety of choices for interacting with and exploring the findings. The PI has extensive experience studying the process of co-production of knowledge and in facilitating collaborative research aimed at producing actionable climate change adaptation science.
projectStatus
Completed
Preview Image
Lightning Creek at Clark Fork, ID during 2015 drought - Credit: Ryan Smith, USGS